<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Google Advanced Search Operators for SEO</title>
	<link>http://lornali.com/internet-marketing/7-google-advanced-search-operators-for-seo</link>
	<description>Search Marketing &#038; Web 2.0 Strategies for Green &#038; Social Activism</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Google Search Sucks</title>
		<link>http://lornali.com/internet-marketing/7-google-advanced-search-operators-for-seo#comment-1271</link>
		<author>Google Search Sucks</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lornali.com/internet-marketing/7-google-advanced-search-operators-for-seo#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>I wish more people outside the online marketing community knew about these operators. It would save them so many hours searching online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish more people outside the online marketing community knew about these operators. It would save them so many hours searching online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celina Buy</title>
		<link>http://lornali.com/internet-marketing/7-google-advanced-search-operators-for-seo#comment-1221</link>
		<author>Celina Buy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lornali.com/internet-marketing/7-google-advanced-search-operators-for-seo#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>I wasn't aware of those anchor ones. After reading this I did some experimentation and I think I have some good tips for anyone who wants to find out hoe competitive a keyword is and what you will likely need to rank for that keyword.

If you do intitle:keyword, inanchor:keyword and compare the results you can find out what is working. Additionally, if there are sites that drop a lot when doing these queries it will be due to the fact that they have a strong domain and not link text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware of those anchor ones. After reading this I did some experimentation and I think I have some good tips for anyone who wants to find out hoe competitive a keyword is and what you will likely need to rank for that keyword.</p>
<p>If you do intitle:keyword, inanchor:keyword and compare the results you can find out what is working. Additionally, if there are sites that drop a lot when doing these queries it will be due to the fact that they have a strong domain and not link text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pros and Cons of Google Advanced Query Operators &#124; SEO Theory - SEO Theory and Analysis Blog</title>
		<link>http://lornali.com/internet-marketing/7-google-advanced-search-operators-for-seo#comment-1201</link>
		<author>Pros and Cons of Google Advanced Query Operators &#124; SEO Theory - SEO Theory and Analysis Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lornali.com/internet-marketing/7-google-advanced-search-operators-for-seo#comment-1201</guid>
		<description>[...] noticed a link to SEO Theory from this nice roundup on Google advanced query operators by Lorna Li. Without meaning to steal her thunder, I&#8217;d like to offer some comments on popular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] noticed a link to SEO Theory from this nice roundup on Google advanced query operators by Lorna Li. Without meaning to steal her thunder, I&#8217;d like to offer some comments on popular [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
